railway man
         n 1: an employee of a railroad [syn: {trainman}, {railroader},
               {railroad man}, {railwayman}, {railway man}]

English Dictionary: railway man	by the DICT Development Group
From WordNet (r) 3.0 (2006) [wn]:
railwayman n an employee of a railroad [syn: trainman, railroader, railroad man, railwayman, railway man]
From WordNet (r) 3.0 (2006) [wn]:
real number n any rational or irrational number [syn: real number, real]
From WordNet (r) 3.0 (2006) [wn]:
riyal-omani n the basic unit of money in Oman [syn: riyal-omani, {Omani rial}, rial]
From Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary (1913) [web1913]:
Reilluminate \Re`il*lu"mi*nate\ (-l?"m?*n?t), v. t.       To enlighten again; to reillumine.
From Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary (1913) [web1913]:
Reillumination \Re`il*lu`mi*na"tion\ (-n?"sh?n), n.       The act or process of enlightening again.
From Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary (1913) [web1913]:
Reillumine \Re`il*lu"mine\ (-l?"m?n), v. t.       To illumine again or anew; to reillume.
From Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary (1913) [web1913]:
Relumine \Re*lu"mine\ (r?-l?"m?n), v. t. [imp. & p. p.       {Relumined} (-m?nd); p. pr. & vb. n. {Relumining}.] [See       {Relume}.]       1. To light anew; to rekindle. --Shak.          2. To illuminate again.
From Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary (1913) [web1913]:
Relumine \Re*lu"mine\ (r?-l?"m?n), v. t. [imp. & p. p.       {Relumined} (-m?nd); p. pr. & vb. n. {Relumining}.] [See       {Relume}.]       1. To light anew; to rekindle. --Shak.          2. To illuminate again.
From Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary (1913) [web1913]:
Relume \Re*lume"\ (r?-l?m"), v. t. [imp. & p. p. {Relumed}       (-l?md"); p. pr. & vb. n. {Reluming}.] [OF. relumer (cf. F.       rallumer), L. reluminare; pref. re- re- + luminare to light.       Cf. {Reillume}.]       To rekindle; to light again.                   Relumed her ancient light, not kindled new. --Pope.                   I know not where is that Promethean heat That can thy                light relume.                                          --Shak.
From Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary (1913) [web1913]:
Relumine \Re*lu"mine\ (r?-l?"m?n), v. t. [imp. & p. p.       {Relumined} (-m?nd); p. pr. & vb. n. {Relumining}.] [See       {Relume}.]       1. To light anew; to rekindle. --Shak.          2. To illuminate again.
From Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary (1913) [web1913]:
Rule-monger \Rule"-mon`ger\, n.       A stickler for rules; a slave of rules [R.] --Hare.
From The Free On-line Dictionary of Computing (15Feb98) [foldoc]:
real number          One of the infinitely divisible range of values       between positive and negative {infinity}, used to represent       continuous physical quantities such as distance, time and       temperature.          Between any two real numbers there are infinitely many more       real numbers.   The {integers} ("counting numbers") are real       numbers with no fractional part and real numbers ("measuring       numbers") are {complex numbers} with no imaginary part.   Real       numbers can be divided into {rational numbers} and {irrational       numbers}.          Real numbers are usually represented (approximately) by       computers as {floating point} numbers.          Strictly, real numbers are the {equivalence classes} of the       {Cauchy sequences} of {rationals} under the {equivalence       relation} "~", where a ~ b if and only if a-b is {Cauchy} with       limit 0.          The real numbers are the minimal {topologically closed}       {field} containing the rational field.          A sequence, r, of rationals (i.e. a function, r, from the       {natural numbers} to the rationals) is said to be Cauchy       precisely if, for any tolerance delta there is a size, N,       beyond which: for any n, m exceeding N,             | r[n] - r[m] | < delta          A Cauchy sequence, r, has limit x precisely if, for any       tolerance delta there is a size, N, beyond which: for any n       exceeding N,             | r[n] - x | < delta          (i.e. r would remain Cauchy if any of its elements, no matter       how late, were replaced by x).          It is possible to perform addition on the reals, because the       equivalence class of a sum of two sequences can be shown to be       the equivalence class of the sum of any two sequences       equivalent to the given originals: ie, a~b and c~d implies       a+c~b+d; likewise a.c~b.d so we can perform multiplication.       Indeed, there is a natural {embedding} of the rationals in the       reals (via, for any rational, the sequence which takes no       other value than that rational) which suffices, when extended       via continuity, to import most of the algebraic properties of       the rationals to the reals.          (1997-03-12)